President Barack Obama plans to make smart gun technology a primary part of his push to control firearms, but an expert warns that the new high-tech weaponry poses a danger to constitutional rights—and he’s not talking about the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court has held the Fifth Amendment protects a person from being compelled to testify against himself, or from providing evidence, but does not offer protection against being compelled to produce a fingerprint. This could allow the government to force people to put their hand on the [smart] gun and open it. If only the owner of the gun could use the gun, and police could compel him to identify the weapon, then—so the argument goes—you are requiring him to incriminate himself.
You may also like
Antifa activists say violence is necessary
Carbon footprints of the hurricane telethon stars
Supreme Court lifts restrictions on Trump travel ban
Canadian judge suspended for wearing ‘Make...
Antifa throws smoke and projectiles at police at...
Out-of-staters may have won New Hampshire for Clinton
About the author

Teunis Felter
Teunis Felter has over 20 years experience as an author, editor, and scientist. When not exploring outside, he enjoys reading history, researching genealogy, and civilly discussing politics.