Though the Women’s March on Washington was driven by the left, it claimed to speak for women in general, and indeed women of all ages, races and states poured onto the National Mall. Yet lost in the action, then and since, is any sense of what the movement stands for; ultimately, it settled for a sense of what the movement is against. Perhaps most pointedly, while the Women’s March claimed to stand for love, nonviolence and inclusion, its organizers staunchly refused to extend that “inclusion” to pro-life women.
You may also like
Antifa activists say violence is necessary
Carbon footprints of the hurricane telethon stars
Supreme Court lifts restrictions on Trump travel ban
Canadian judge suspended for wearing ‘Make...
Antifa throws smoke and projectiles at police at...
Out-of-staters may have won New Hampshire for Clinton
About the author

Teunis Felter
Teunis Felter has over 20 years experience as an author, editor, and scientist. When not exploring outside, he enjoys reading history, researching genealogy, and civilly discussing politics.